Friday, November 16, 2018

They are Victims Both


Antoinette is undoubtedly the primary victim in Wide Sargasso Sea. Her whole life has been filled with hardship after hardship: as a young child she was spurned by the former slaves, other whit Jamaicans, and even her mother. She witnessed a stranger take over her home and drive her mother insane. Her house is burned down and one of her only friends throws a rock at her, injuring her greatly. Eventually, she and all of her possessions are sold off to another person who goes on to lock her up in a prison of an attic. If Antoinette is the primary victim of the story, than it is easy to paint Rochester as the primary Villain. I would argue, however, that Rochester is another victim of the story and suffers at the hand of the same villain, although he undoubtedly does not suffer to the same extent as Antoinette.

I see the primary villain of the book as being the systems of laws and institutions that are the British empire. The extent of Antoinette’s suffering at the hands of British law and customs is closer to the surface and easy to see than that of Rochester’s, so I will explore Rochester’s suffering more. Under British law and customs, only the eldest son gets to inherit the possessions, status, and even identity of his family in full. As a younger son, Rochester is denied the home he grew up in and along with it his very place in the world. At the same time, society and likely his father send him the message that the entire measure of his success and worth is the extent to which he fills his father’s shoes. The fact that his father’s shoes are not left to him, puts him in a really challenging situation where his very identity is at stake.

In order to do his best to succeed in the context of the English aristocracy, even though he was locked out of it by his order of birth to some extent, Rochester heads to the east indies to marry and gain an estate to be his own. Once there, he finds himself in a completely unfamiliar world and feels very uncomfortable and very much the outsider. He then finds out that he had unwittingly married a woman thought widely to be crazy or on the way to it, confirming his suspicions that this new unfamiliar world was hiding something from him. Rochester’s life was such a series of painful events that its best moment may have been the death of his brother and father. Finally, he could become what society had taught him he must become, but his family members had to die so he could do it. Once he has finally achieved his ambition that he had had knowing or not since the day of his conception, Rochester seeks burry all of his painful past and to lock it away out of sight. His locking up of Antoinette can be seen as a physical manifestation of this psychological need to forget and repress.

3 comments:

  1. I agree with this point of view. It is important to remember that it isn't only Antoinette who is the victim of the story. Rochester has his own backstory and both characters are victims of the systems of laws and institutions of the British empire.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with this idea that Rochester is also a victim. You also provide an interesting extension that explains the locking up of Antoinette that had not considered. The article I spoke about in my panel presentation didn't really explain this idea, but its a natural extension that seems logical--hes locking up his past by locking up Antoinette.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This book is full of victims and I Agree with you when it comes to the Antionette being the main one or the primary focus of the book. I'm glad that you talked about both the characters because some people seem to skip over Rochester and I feel like he is a big character that shouldn't be over looked or at least not just looked for all the bad things that he has done.

    ReplyDelete